重构 改为标准化输出

This commit is contained in:
2026-09-01 14:10:23 +08:00
parent 7533b298f1
commit bc87bd6d2d
10151 changed files with 1709487 additions and 11776 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
{
"claim_coverage": [
{
"claim_id": "claim_001",
"evidence_refs": [
"e1"
],
"status": "pass"
},
{
"claim_id": "claim_002",
"evidence_refs": [
"e2"
],
"status": "pass"
},
{
"claim_id": "claim_003",
"evidence_refs": [
"e3"
],
"status": "pass"
},
{
"claim_id": "claim_004",
"evidence_refs": [
"e4"
],
"status": "pass"
},
{
"claim_id": "claim_005",
"evidence_refs": [
"e5",
"e6"
],
"status": "fail"
},
{
"claim_id": "claim_006",
"evidence_refs": [
"e5",
"e6"
],
"status": "fail"
},
{
"claim_id": "claim_007",
"evidence_refs": [
"e5",
"e6"
],
"status": "fail"
}
],
"evidence": [
"e1: Deterministic gate reports one solid.",
"e2: Deterministic gate reports X bbox 140.0 mm within 0.1 mm tolerance.",
"e3: Deterministic gate reports Y bbox 100.0 mm within 0.1 mm tolerance.",
"e4: Deterministic gate reports Z bbox 25.0 mm within 0.1 mm tolerance.",
"e5: Top render shows only the outer rectangular plate outline; no centered 100 x 70 pocket boundary is visible.",
"e6: Isometric and orthographic side renders show a plain rectangular slab with no visible stepped pocket geometry or R5 internal corner arcs."
],
"issues": [
"Required centered first-level pocket is not visible in the supplied top/isometric renders.",
"Required centered second-level pocket is not visible inside the first pocket.",
"Required R5 internal pocket corner fillets are not visible because the pocket geometry itself appears absent."
],
"verdict": "repair",
"working_head": "cad_25dae605e0f4:rev_001:v11"
}
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
{
"claim_coverage": [
{
"claim_id": "claim_001",
"evidence_refs": [
"det_solid_count"
],
"status": "pass"
},
{
"claim_id": "claim_002",
"evidence_refs": [
"det_bbox_x"
],
"status": "pass"
},
{
"claim_id": "claim_003",
"evidence_refs": [
"det_bbox_y"
],
"status": "pass"
},
{
"claim_id": "claim_004",
"evidence_refs": [
"det_bbox_z"
],
"status": "pass"
},
{
"claim_id": "claim_005",
"evidence_refs": [
"visual_top_first_pocket",
"visual_side_first_pocket"
],
"status": "pass"
},
{
"claim_id": "claim_006",
"evidence_refs": [
"visual_missing_second_pocket"
],
"status": "fail"
},
{
"claim_id": "claim_007",
"evidence_refs": [
"visual_sharp_internal_corners"
],
"status": "fail"
}
],
"evidence": [
"det_solid_count: Deterministic result reports exactly 1 solid.",
"det_bbox_x: Deterministic bounding box X dimension is 140.0 mm within 0.1 mm tolerance.",
"det_bbox_y: Deterministic bounding box Y dimension is 100.0 mm within 0.1 mm tolerance.",
"det_bbox_z: Deterministic bounding box Z dimension is 25.0 mm within 0.1 mm tolerance.",
"visual_top_first_pocket: Top view shows a centered rectangular pocket outline on the top face.",
"visual_side_first_pocket: Side/front/back views show a shallow recessed feature from the top face consistent with a first pocket.",
"visual_missing_second_pocket: Top and isometric views show only one pocket outline/floor; no centered smaller second-level 60 mm by 35 mm pocket is visible inside the first pocket.",
"visual_sharp_internal_corners: Pocket outlines in top/isometric views have square 90-degree internal corners, with no visible R5 corner radii on either pocket level."
],
"issues": [
"The centered second-level pocket is not visible in the supplied render evidence.",
"Internal pocket corners appear sharp rather than R5 filleted."
],
"verdict": "repair",
"working_head": "cad_25dae605e0f4:rev_002:v33"
}